Skip to content

api(materialize/v0): add affected permissions to breaking schema change#162

Merged
ostafen merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

api(materialize/v0): add affected permissions to breaking schema change#162
ostafen merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations

Conversation

@ostafen
Copy link
Contributor

@ostafen ostafen commented Feb 16, 2026

… message

Description

Testing

References

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 16, 2026

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Lint / lint (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed❌ failed (10)✅ passedFeb 17, 2026, 7:51 AM

@ostafen ostafen force-pushed the feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations branch from 10acd5c to b4be177 Compare February 16, 2026 11:59
@ostafen ostafen force-pushed the feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations branch from db59345 to 86bc873 Compare February 16, 2026 14:34
@ostafen ostafen force-pushed the feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations branch from 86bc873 to c931159 Compare February 16, 2026 14:36
@ostafen ostafen changed the title api(materialize/v0): add affected relations to breaking schema change… api(materialize/v0): add affected permissions to breaking schema change Feb 16, 2026
Copy link
Member

@josephschorr josephschorr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ostafen ostafen marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 07:51
@ostafen ostafen merged commit f1e471e into main Feb 17, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
@ostafen ostafen deleted the feat/breaking-schema-affected-relations branch February 17, 2026 07:52
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 17, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments